<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Steepest Streets and Crookedest Streets in San Francisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sftravel.com/blog/2009/11/15/steepest-crookedest-san-francisco-streets.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sftravel.com/blog/2009/11/15/steepest-crookedest-san-francisco-streets.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memorial Day in San Francisco &#124;</title>
		<link>http://sftravel.com/blog/2009/11/15/steepest-crookedest-san-francisco-streets.html/comment-page-1#comment-17473</link>
		<dc:creator>Memorial Day in San Francisco &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sftravel.com/blog/?p=208#comment-17473</guid>
		<description>[...] Steepest &amp; Crookedest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steepest &amp; Crookedest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip Newhall</title>
		<link>http://sftravel.com/blog/2009/11/15/steepest-crookedest-san-francisco-streets.html/comment-page-1#comment-6574</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip Newhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sftravel.com/blog/?p=208#comment-6574</guid>
		<description>This is a nice article. A few comments:

In 2008 I visited the Bay Area with a six-foot level having a calibrated slope-measuring instrument. For each of the results below, I made 5 measurements on each of two separate days and averaged the results. I was careful to measure so that local, short-period irregularities did not skew the numbers.

In the following list, the first street in parentheses is at the top of the hill; the other is at the bottom. The numbers are percent grade [i.e., the tangent of the angle of the street with the horizontal]:

San Francisco (all streets one-way down):

22nd Street (Vicksburg to Church): 31.7%
Filbert Street (Hyde to Leavenworth): 31.3%
Kearney Street (Vallejo to Broadway): 30.3 %

Berkeley (Marin is a two-way street):

Marin Avenue (Hilldale to Euclid): 25.9%
Marin Avenue (Grizzly Peak Blvd to Keeler): 25.0%
Marin Avenue (Keeler to Hilldale): 24.4%

As a footnote, in Laguna Beach, California, the block of 3rd Street between Park and Mermaid has a 30.3% grade. Amazingly, it is a two-way street!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice article. A few comments:</p>
<p>In 2008 I visited the Bay Area with a six-foot level having a calibrated slope-measuring instrument. For each of the results below, I made 5 measurements on each of two separate days and averaged the results. I was careful to measure so that local, short-period irregularities did not skew the numbers.</p>
<p>In the following list, the first street in parentheses is at the top of the hill; the other is at the bottom. The numbers are percent grade [i.e., the tangent of the angle of the street with the horizontal]:</p>
<p>San Francisco (all streets one-way down):</p>
<p>22nd Street (Vicksburg to Church): 31.7%<br />
Filbert Street (Hyde to Leavenworth): 31.3%<br />
Kearney Street (Vallejo to Broadway): 30.3 %</p>
<p>Berkeley (Marin is a two-way street):</p>
<p>Marin Avenue (Hilldale to Euclid): 25.9%<br />
Marin Avenue (Grizzly Peak Blvd to Keeler): 25.0%<br />
Marin Avenue (Keeler to Hilldale): 24.4%</p>
<p>As a footnote, in Laguna Beach, California, the block of 3rd Street between Park and Mermaid has a 30.3% grade. Amazingly, it is a two-way street!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

